Undergoing breast augmentation surgery in Boston under the care of Dr. William E. LoVerme can be a positive, life-changing experience. Boston, Wellesley, Sudbury and MetroWest patients who have had the procedure often remark that they love their new figure and have greater self-confidence.

Nonetheless, the decision to undergo breast enhancement should not be taken lightly, as it is a serious surgical procedure and the results of the procedure are extremely long lasting.

• History of Breast Implants
• Saline vs. Silicone Breast Implants
• Breast Implant Size
• Other Breast Implant Choices

There are several important decisions that must be made during the breast augmentation process, including what type, size, shape, texture and profile of breast implants to choose. To help you make an informed decision about which breast implants to choose, the team at Accurate Aesthetics offers the following information about your breast implant options.

Breast implants have been used since the mid-1960s. Initially, the implants used were most often comprised of silicone gel. In the 1980s and ’90s, citizens started raising concerns about the safety of silicone breast implants, asserting that they cause autoimmune disease. In 1992, after much debate about whether silicone implants were safe (including the implementation of a voluntary moratorium on the distribution of silicone implants proposed by the FDA and agreed to by implant manufacturers), the FDA placed a moratorium on the use of silicone breast implants, except for women undergoing breast reconstruction surgery or for those who already had silicone implants and needed to replace them. Saline implants were still available on the market.

However, in 2006, after reviewing the findings of many clinical studies conducted to prove the safety of silicone breast implants and concluding that they do not cause autoimmune disease, the FDA lifted the ban on silicone breast implants, allowing them to be used in breast augmentation procedures for patients who are at least 22 years old. The FDA also approved the use of a newer style of silicone breast implants: highly cohesive, form-stable silicone implants, often referred to as “gummy bear” implants, due to the gummy-like consistency of the filling material.

Aside from the concern regarding a correlation between silicone implants and autoimmune disease, there was also a concern that silicone implants caused capsular contracture (a potentially painful condition in which scar tissue hardens around the implant, causing the breasts to feel hard). To prevent capsular contracture in patients with silicone implants, plastic surgeons started instructing these patients to massage the treatment area to keep any scar tissue as supple as possible. This worked well and led plastic surgeons to the realization that by placing the implants under the pectoralis (chest) muscle, the implants would in essence get massaged every time the arm was moved. Indeed, this did help minimize the incidence of capsular contracture, and is still a recommended treatment protocol.

With postoperative massage and especially with submuscular placement, the chance of capsular contracture with first-generation silicone implants is greatly reduced. Also, the newest-generation silicone implants do not necessarily need to be placed beneath the chest muscle to reduce the risk of capsular contracture, thanks to their highly cohesive, form-stable filling material. In addition, silicone implants have been proven to be safe for use in breast augmentation surgery. However, some breast augmentation patients still opt for saline breast implants. Ultimately, the choice between saline and silicone implants is a personal one. To help you make this decision, here are some of the advantages and disadvantages of each type of implant.

Saline Implants

Saline implants are filled with a sterile saltwater solution that the body naturally absorbs in case of an implant leak or rupture. They are also slightly less expensive than silicone implants. Finally, because saline implants are filled after they are inserted, Dr. LoVerme can make small adjustments to the size of the implants during the operation.

However, saline implants are more prone to folding, rippling or wrinkling within the implant pocket, and may be visible underneath the skin’s surface. For this reason, they are not necessarily the best option for women with thin skin or an insufficient amount of body fat to cover and support the implants properly.

Traditional Silicone Implants

Traditional silicone implants are filled with silicone gel. They are slightly more expensive than saline implants, but they more closely resemble the look and feel of natural breasts. They are also less prone to rippling within the implant pocket and to being visible underneath the skin’s surface.

The safety of silicone implants is shown by the fact that the body cannot absorb the filling material in case of a leak or rupture. Instead, the filling material stays intact either within or close to the implant pocket. This may make it more difficult to detect if there is a problem with the implant. For this reason, the FDA recommends that patients with silicone implants undergo a breast imaging exam every three years, starting the third year after the initial augmentation procedure.

Highly Cohesive Silicone Implants

The newest-generation implants are also silicone, but they are comprised of a more cohesive silicone filling material. Due to the gummy-like consistency of the filling material, these implants are often referred to by the public as “gummy bear” implants. Thanks to the advanced filling material, these implants are very unlikely to fold or move around within the implant pocket. Also, the filling material is form stable, meaning that it will maintain its form when the patient is reclining or even when cut in half.

These implants feel slightly firmer than the other options. However, they come in a variety of shapes and profiles, often making them a good option for women with very small breasts, those wanting a specific shape and some patients needing revision breast surgery or breast reconstruction for cancer.

Undergoing breast augmentation surgery in Boston under the care of Dr. William E. LoVerme can be a positive, life-changing experience. Boston, Wellesley, Sudbury and MetroWest patients who have had the procedure often remark that they love their new figure and have greater self-confidence.

Nonetheless, the decision to undergo breast enhancement should not be taken lightly, as it is a serious surgical procedure and the results of the procedure are extremely long lasting.

• History of Breast Implants
• Saline vs. Silicone Breast Implants
• Breast Implant Size
• Other Breast Implant Choices

There are several important decisions that must be made during the breast augmentation process, including what type, size, shape, texture and profile of breast implants to choose. To help you make an informed decision about which breast implants to choose, the team at Accurate Aesthetics offers the following information about your breast implant options.

Breast implants have been used since the mid-1960s. Initially, the implants used were most often comprised of silicone gel. In the 1980s and ’90s, citizens started raising concerns about the safety of silicone breast implants, asserting that they cause autoimmune disease. In 1992, after much debate about whether silicone implants were safe (including the implementation of a voluntary moratorium on the distribution of silicone implants proposed by the FDA and agreed to by implant manufacturers), the FDA placed a moratorium on the use of silicone breast implants, except for women undergoing breast reconstruction surgery or for those who already had silicone implants and needed to replace them. Saline implants were still available on the market.

However, in 2006, after reviewing the findings of many clinical studies conducted to prove the safety of silicone breast implants and concluding that they do not cause autoimmune disease, the FDA lifted the ban on silicone breast implants, allowing them to be used in breast augmentation procedures for patients who are at least 22 years old. The FDA also approved the use of a newer style of silicone breast implants: highly cohesive, form-stable silicone implants, often referred to as “gummy bear” implants, due to the gummy-like consistency of the filling material.

Aside from the concern regarding a correlation between silicone implants and autoimmune disease, there was also a concern that silicone implants caused capsular contracture (a potentially painful condition in which scar tissue hardens around the implant, causing the breasts to feel hard). To prevent capsular contracture in patients with silicone implants, plastic surgeons started instructing these patients to massage the treatment area to keep any scar tissue as supple as possible. This worked well and led plastic surgeons to the realization that by placing the implants under the pectoralis (chest) muscle, the implants would in essence get massaged every time the arm was moved. Indeed, this did help minimize the incidence of capsular contracture, and is still a recommended treatment protocol.

With postoperative massage and especially with submuscular placement, the chance of capsular contracture with first-generation silicone implants is greatly reduced. Also, the newest-generation silicone implants do not necessarily need to be placed beneath the chest muscle to reduce the risk of capsular contracture, thanks to their highly cohesive, form-stable filling material. In addition, silicone implants have been proven to be safe for use in breast augmentation surgery. However, some breast augmentation patients still opt for saline breast implants. Ultimately, the choice between saline and silicone implants is a personal one. To help you make this decision, here are some of the advantages and disadvantages of each type of implant.

Saline Implants

Saline implants are filled with a sterile saltwater solution that the body naturally absorbs in case of an implant leak or rupture. They are also slightly less expensive than silicone implants. Finally, because saline implants are filled after they are inserted, Dr. LoVerme can make small adjustments to the size of the implants during the operation.

However, saline implants are more prone to folding, rippling or wrinkling within the implant pocket, and may be visible underneath the skin’s surface. For this reason, they are not necessarily the best option for women with thin skin or an insufficient amount of body fat to cover and support the implants properly.

Traditional Silicone Implants

Traditional silicone implants are filled with silicone gel. They are slightly more expensive than saline implants, but they more closely resemble the look and feel of natural breasts. They are also less prone to rippling within the implant pocket and to being visible underneath the skin’s surface.
The safety of silicone implants is shown by the fact that the body cannot absorb the filling material in case of a leak or rupture. Instead, the filling material stays intact either within or close to the implant pocket. This may make it more difficult to detect if there is a problem with the implant. For this reason, the FDA recommends that patients with silicone implants undergo a breast imaging exam every three years, starting the third year after the initial augmentation procedure.

Highly Cohesive Silicone Implants

The newest-generation implants are also silicone, but they are comprised of a more cohesive silicone filling material. Due to the gummy-like consistency of the filling material, these implants are often referred to by the public as “gummy bear” implants. Thanks to the advanced filling material, these implants are very unlikely to fold or move around within the implant pocket. Also, the filling material is form stable, meaning that it will maintain its form when the patient is reclining or even when cut in half.

These implants feel slightly firmer than the other options. However, they come in a variety of shapes and profiles, often making them a good option for women with very small breasts, those wanting a specific shape and some patients needing revision breast surgery or breast reconstruction for cancer.

Undergoing breast augmentation surgery in Boston under the care of Dr. William E. LoVerme can be a positive, life-changing experience. Boston, Wellesley, Sudbury and MetroWest patients who have had the procedure often remark that they love their new figure and have greater self-confidence.

Nonetheless, the decision to undergo breast enhancement should not be taken lightly, as it is a serious surgical procedure and the results of the procedure are extremely long lasting.

• History of Breast Implants
• Saline vs. Silicone Breast Implants
• Breast Implant Size
• Other Breast Implant Choices

There are several important decisions that must be made during the breast augmentation process, including what type, size, shape, texture and profile of breast implants to choose. To help you make an informed decision about which breast implants to choose, the team at Accurate Aesthetics offers the following information about your breast implant options.

Breast implants have been used since the mid-1960s. Initially, the implants used were most often comprised of silicone gel. In the 1980s and ’90s, citizens started raising concerns about the safety of silicone breast implants, asserting that they cause autoimmune disease. In 1992, after much debate about whether silicone implants were safe (including the implementation of a voluntary moratorium on the distribution of silicone implants proposed by the FDA and agreed to by implant manufacturers), the FDA placed a moratorium on the use of silicone breast implants, except for women undergoing breast reconstruction surgery or for those who already had silicone implants and needed to replace them. Saline implants were still available on the market.

However, in 2006, after reviewing the findings of many clinical studies conducted to prove the safety of silicone breast implants and concluding that they do not cause autoimmune disease, the FDA lifted the ban on silicone breast implants, allowing them to be used in breast augmentation procedures for patients who are at least 22 years old. The FDA also approved the use of a newer style of silicone breast implants: highly cohesive, form-stable silicone implants, often referred to as “gummy bear” implants, due to the gummy-like consistency of the filling material.

Aside from the concern regarding a correlation between silicone implants and autoimmune disease, there was also a concern that silicone implants caused capsular contracture (a potentially painful condition in which scar tissue hardens around the implant, causing the breasts to feel hard). To prevent capsular contracture in patients with silicone implants, plastic surgeons started instructing these patients to massage the treatment area to keep any scar tissue as supple as possible. This worked well and led plastic surgeons to the realization that by placing the implants under the pectoralis (chest) muscle, the implants would in essence get massaged every time the arm was moved. Indeed, this did help minimize the incidence of capsular contracture, and is still a recommended treatment protocol.

With postoperative massage and especially with submuscular placement, the chance of capsular contracture with first-generation silicone implants is greatly reduced. Also, the newest-generation silicone implants do not necessarily need to be placed beneath the chest muscle to reduce the risk of capsular contracture, thanks to their highly cohesive, form-stable filling material. In addition, silicone implants have been proven to be safe for use in breast augmentation surgery. However, some breast augmentation patients still opt for saline breast implants. Ultimately, the choice between saline and silicone implants is a personal one. To help you make this decision, here are some of the advantages and disadvantages of each type of implant.

Saline Implants

Saline implants are filled with a sterile saltwater solution that the body naturally absorbs in case of an implant leak or rupture. They are also slightly less expensive than silicone implants. Finally, because saline implants are filled after they are inserted, Dr. LoVerme can make small adjustments to the size of the implants during the operation.

However, saline implants are more prone to folding, rippling or wrinkling within the implant pocket, and may be visible underneath the skin’s surface. For this reason, they are not necessarily the best option for women with thin skin or an insufficient amount of body fat to cover and support the implants properly.

Traditional Silicone Implants

Traditional silicone implants are filled with silicone gel. They are slightly more expensive than saline implants, but they more closely resemble the look and feel of natural breasts. They are also less prone to rippling within the implant pocket and to being visible underneath the skin’s surface.
The safety of silicone implants is shown by the fact that the body cannot absorb the filling material in case of a leak or rupture. Instead, the filling material stays intact either within or close to the implant pocket. This may make it more difficult to detect if there is a problem with the implant. For this reason, the FDA recommends that patients with silicone implants undergo a breast imaging exam every three years, starting the third year after the initial augmentation procedure.

Highly Cohesive Silicone Implants

The newest-generation implants are also silicone, but they are comprised of a more cohesive silicone filling material. Due to the gummy-like consistency of the filling material, these implants are often referred to by the public as “gummy bear” implants. Thanks to the advanced filling material, these implants are very unlikely to fold or move around within the implant pocket. Also, the filling material is form stable, meaning that it will maintain its form when the patient is reclining or even when cut in half.
These implants feel slightly firmer than the other options. However, they come in a variety of shapes and profiles, often making them a good option for women with very small breasts, those wanting a specific shape and some patients needing revision breast surgery or breast reconstruction for cancer.

Undergoing breast augmentation surgery in Boston under the care of Dr. William E. LoVerme can be a positive, life-changing experience. Boston, Wellesley, Sudbury and MetroWest patients who have had the procedure often remark that they love their new figure and have greater self-confidence.

Nonetheless, the decision to undergo breast enhancement should not be taken lightly, as it is a serious surgical procedure and the results of the procedure are extremely long lasting.

• History of Breast Implants
• Saline vs. Silicone Breast Implants
• Breast Implant Size
• Other Breast Implant Choices

There are several important decisions that must be made during the breast augmentation process, including what type, size, shape, texture and profile of breast implants to choose. To help you make an informed decision about which breast implants to choose, the team at Accurate Aesthetics offers the following information about your breast implant options.

Breast implants have been used since the mid-1960s. Initially, the implants used were most often comprised of silicone gel. In the 1980s and ’90s, citizens started raising concerns about the safety of silicone breast implants, asserting that they cause autoimmune disease. In 1992, after much debate about whether silicone implants were safe (including the implementation of a voluntary moratorium on the distribution of silicone implants proposed by the FDA and agreed to by implant manufacturers), the FDA placed a moratorium on the use of silicone breast implants, except for women undergoing breast reconstruction surgery or for those who already had silicone implants and needed to replace them. Saline implants were still available on the market.

However, in 2006, after reviewing the findings of many clinical studies conducted to prove the safety of silicone breast implants and concluding that they do not cause autoimmune disease, the FDA lifted the ban on silicone breast implants, allowing them to be used in breast augmentation procedures for patients who are at least 22 years old. The FDA also approved the use of a newer style of silicone breast implants: highly cohesive, form-stable silicone implants, often referred to as “gummy bear” implants, due to the gummy-like consistency of the filling material.

Aside from the concern regarding a correlation between silicone implants and autoimmune disease, there was also a concern that silicone implants caused capsular contracture (a potentially painful condition in which scar tissue hardens around the implant, causing the breasts to feel hard). To prevent capsular contracture in patients with silicone implants, plastic surgeons started instructing these patients to massage the treatment area to keep any scar tissue as supple as possible. This worked well and led plastic surgeons to the realization that by placing the implants under the pectoralis (chest) muscle, the implants would in essence get massaged every time the arm was moved. Indeed, this did help minimize the incidence of capsular contracture, and is still a recommended treatment protocol.

With postoperative massage and especially with submuscular placement, the chance of capsular contracture with first-generation silicone implants is greatly reduced. Also, the newest-generation silicone implants do not necessarily need to be placed beneath the chest muscle to reduce the risk of capsular contracture, thanks to their highly cohesive, form-stable filling material. In addition, silicone implants have been proven to be safe for use in breast augmentation surgery. However, some breast augmentation patients still opt for saline breast implants. Ultimately, the choice between saline and silicone implants is a personal one. To help you make this decision, here are some of the advantages and disadvantages of each type of implant.

Saline Implants

Saline implants are filled with a sterile saltwater solution that the body naturally absorbs in case of an implant leak or rupture. They are also slightly less expensive than silicone implants. Finally, because saline implants are filled after they are inserted, Dr. LoVerme can make small adjustments to the size of the implants during the operation.

However, saline implants are more prone to folding, rippling or wrinkling within the implant pocket, and may be visible underneath the skin’s surface. For this reason, they are not necessarily the best option for women with thin skin or an insufficient amount of body fat to cover and support the implants properly.

Traditional Silicone Implants

Traditional silicone implants are filled with silicone gel. They are slightly more expensive than saline implants, but they more closely resemble the look and feel of natural breasts. They are also less prone to rippling within the implant pocket and to being visible underneath the skin’s surface.

The safety of silicone implants is shown by the fact that the body cannot absorb the filling material in case of a leak or rupture. Instead, the filling material stays intact either within or close to the implant pocket. This may make it more difficult to detect if there is a problem with the implant. For this reason, the FDA recommends that patients with silicone implants undergo a breast imaging exam every three years, starting the third year after the initial augmentation procedure.

Highly Cohesive Silicone Implants

The newest-generation implants are also silicone, but they are comprised of a more cohesive silicone filling material. Due to the gummy-like consistency of the filling material, these implants are often referred to by the public as “gummy bear” implants. Thanks to the advanced filling material, these implants are very unlikely to fold or move around within the implant pocket. Also, the filling material is form stable, meaning that it will maintain its form when the patient is reclining or even when cut in half.

These implants feel slightly firmer than the other options. However, they come in a variety of shapes and profiles, often making them a good option for women with very small breasts, those wanting a specific shape and some patients needing revision breast surgery or breast reconstruction for cancer.